Business

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against Science Applications International Corporation who is accused of charging inflated prices under grants to train first responder personnel to prevent and respond to terrorism attacks.

The whistleblower's share of the recovery has not been determined. 

The case, filed in February 2012, alleged that SAIC’s cost proposals falsely represented that SAIC would use far more expensive personnel to carry out its efforts than it intended to use and actually did use, resulting in inflated charges to the United States.

Between 2002 and 2012, the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology (New Mexico Tech) received six federal grants from the Department of Justice, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to train first responder personnel to prevent and respond to terrorism events involving explosive devices.  New Mexico Tech awarded subgrants to SAIC to provide course management, development, and instruction.

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against Tennessee Orthopaedic Clinics PC and Appalachian Orthopaedic Clinics PC. They are accused of knowingly billing state and federal health care programs for reimported osteoarthritis medications, known as viscosupplements.

Tennessee Orthopaedic Clinics PC will pay $1.3 million, and Appalachian Orthopaedic Clinics PC will pay $550,000. The whistleblower will receive a $323,750 share of the recovery.

The case, filed in February 2012, alleged that the clinics knowingly purchased deeply discounted viscosupplements that were reimported from foreign countries and billed them to state and federal health care programs in order to profit from the reimbursement system, when such reimported viscosupplements were not reimbursable by those programs.  Allegedly, the reimported product included labeling in foreign languages and in English for additional uses not approved in the United States, which demonstrated that the product was reimported.  Moreover, because the product was reimported, the government alleged there was no manufacturer assurance that it had not been tampered with or that it was stored appropriately.   

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against Frazier Masonry Corp, F-Y Inc, CTI Concrete & Masonry Inc, Masonry Technology Inc, Masonry Works Inc, Russell Frazier and Robert Yowell.  They are accused of misrepresenting their disadvantaged small business status in connection with military construction contracts.

The whistleblower will receive a $393,383 share of the recovery.

This settlement stems from other cases, the first of which was filed in 2012.  The United States alleged the defendant masonry subcontractors and their principals misrepresented to the prime contractors that they were small businesses, and that these misrepresentations caused the prime contractors to falsely certify that they had complied with the small business provisions of the contracts in claiming payment.  Russell Frazier previously pleaded guilty in related criminal proceedings to causing false statements.

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against Hencorp Becstone Capital LC  who is accused of making false statements and claims to the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) in order to obtain loan guarantees.

The whistleblowers will receive $608,000 of the settlement. 

The case, filed in February 2013, alleged that Ricardo Maza, a Peruvian-based former Hencorp business agent, created false documentation to obtain Ex-Im Bank guarantees on fictitious transactions on which no products were sold or exported, and that Hencorp acted recklessly by outsourcing key credit review functions to Maza without adequate supervision or oversight.  The government alleged that Maza then diverted the proceeds of the loans to himself and to his friends and business associates in Peru, and that the transactions resulted in losses to the Ex-Im Bank when the loans were not repaid.  In 2012, Mario Mimbella, 64, of Miami, Florida, the purported U.S.-based exporter on three of the fraudulent transactions, pled guilty to making false records for his participation in the scheme and was later sentenced to prison.

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against US Investigations Services Inc (USIS) and its parent company, Altegrity, who are accused of failing to perform required quality control reviews in connection withbackground investigations that USIS held with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM).

According to the settlement details, the companies have agreed to forgo their right to collect payments that they claim were owed by OPM, valued at least at $30 million, in exchange for a release of liability under the False Claims Act.  

The whistleblower's portion of the recovery has not been determined.

The case, originally filed in July 2011, alleged that beginning in at least March 2008 and continuing through at least September 2012, USIS deliberately circumvented contractually required quality reviews of completed background investigations in order to increase the company’s revenues and profits.  Specifically, USIS allegedly devised a practice referred to internally as “dumping” or “flushing,” which involved releasing cases to OPM and representing them as complete when, in fact, not all the reports of investigations comprising those cases had received a contractually-required quality review.  The government contended that, relying upon USIS’ false representations, OPM issued payments and contract incentives to USIS that it would not otherwise have issued had OPM been aware that the background investigations had not gone through the quality review process required by the contracts.

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against Baptist Health, which owns four Jacksonville hospitals, Memorial Hospital, Specialty Hospital, Lake City Medical Center, Orange Park Medical Center, University of Florida Health Jacksonville, and Century Ambulance Service Inc. 

The whistleblower will receive a $1.2 million share of the recovery.

According to the settlement terms, Baptist Health will pay $2.89 million; Memorial Hospital, Specialty Hospital, Lake City Medical Center and Orange Park Medical Center will pay a combined $2.37 million; University of Florida Health Jacksonville will pay $1 million; and Century will pay $1.25 million.

The case, filed in 2011, alleged that the hospitals routinely ordered ambulance transfers via Century that were medically suspect, costing Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare and the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program millions in unnecessary billings. Additionally, the complaint claimed that the hospitals routinely ordered life support ambulance transfers that were medically unnecessary. In association with this alleged healthcare fraud, Century was accused of knowingly up-coding claims from basic to advanced life support. Century was also accused of transporting patients unnecessarily and needlessly driving patients to their own homes as if it were an emergency.

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against Lockheed Martin Inc who is accused of submitting or causing the submission of false claims and conspired to submit such claims under a contract with the General Services Administration (GSA) in support of the Naval Oceanographic Major Shared Resource Center (NAVO MSRC).

The whistleblower will receive a $560,000 share of the recovery.

The contract in questions was to provide support services for the National Center for Critical Information Processing and Storage (NCCIPS) at the NAVO MSRC at the John C. Stennis Space Center in Hancock County, Miss. GSA awarded the NCCIPS task order in April 2004 to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), which teamed with Lockheed Martin and Applied Enterprise Solutions (AES) to perform under the task order. SAIC was paid a total of $115 million under the contract, of which Lockheed Martin was paid $2 million according to the terms of its subcontract with SAIC.

The case, filed in May 2009, alleged that prior to the issuance, and once the NCCIPS solicitation had been publicized, that then government employees, Stephen Adamec and Robert Knesel, conspired with Lockheed Martin, Galloway, SAIC and AES to ensure that SAIC and its teaming partners were awarded the task order by (a) sharing non public, advance procurement information with the SAIC team that was not provided to other potential bidders; (b) sharing information about the solicitation with the SAIC team before providing that information to other bidders; and choosing a type of contract and putting language in the solicitation in order to bias the selection process to favor the SAIC team.

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital Inc who is accused of submitting false claims to the state of Georgia’s Medicaid program.

The whistleblower will receive $695,151 from the settlement amount.

The whistleblower case, filed in 2008, alleged that between November 2002 and July 2008, the Thomasville, Ga.-hospital made false representations to the Georgia Department of Community Health, the state agency that administers the Medicaid program in Georgia, that it was a public hospital for Medicaid purposes in order to increase the amount of Medicaid funds provided to the hospital. Under Medicaid rules, only public hospitals may participate in the Medicaid Upper Payment Limit (UPL) program. In addition, public hospitals receive additional Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) program funds that are not available to private hospitals. Contrary to its certification to the Georgia Department of Community Health, Archbold Memorial was in fact a private hospital, and as a result received millions of dollars in UPL and DSH funds to which it was not entitled.

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against PC Specialists Inc., doing business as Technology Integration Group (TIG), who is accused of inflating prices of computers sold through another company to the National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA).

The whistleblower's recovery amount has not been determined.

The case was filed in 2014 and alleged that from 2003 to 2013, TIG sold Dell computers to Sandia Corporation for resale to the United States under Sandia’s contract with the NNSA.  The NNSA purchased the computers for use at Sandia National Laboratories.  The United States alleged that TIG knowingly inflated the amounts it charged Sandia by failing to give credits for rebates and discounts it received from Dell as required by its contract and causing false claims to the government for the inflated prices.  

In a separate but related matter, in April 2015, TIG entered into a non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office of the District of New Mexico regarding allegations that three employees in TIG’s Albuquerque branch office engaged in a scheme to defraud the United States by inflating the amounts it charged Sandia for computers.  The non-prosecution agreement in that matter required TIG to terminate the employment of the three employees in its Albuquerque branch office – a vice president, a senior account executive and an accounts executive – who participated in and profited from the scheme.  The non-prosecution agreement also required TIG to retain and pay for an independent monitor selected by the U.S. Attorney’s Office who is responsible for monitoring TIG’s compliance with the agreement, and TIG policies, procedures and training relating to federal government contracts over the agreement’s three-year term. 

A settlement has been reached in a whistleblower class action lawsuit brought against CDI Corporation who is accused of charging the military for work not actually performed. 

Under the terms of the settlement, the whistleblower will receive $360,750.

The whistleblower cae was originally filed in 2005. The United States alleged that CDI wrongfully charged labor costs to work orders under military aircraft engine contracts for The General Electric Company (GE). The civil investigation examined CDI’s labor and billing records from Jan. 15, 2001, to Dec. 31, 2006. The civil investigation found that during this time period, CDI directed the mischarging of employees’ labor costs to purchase orders that would be reimbursed by the U.S. military. In fact, the employees did not perform the work billed to those military projects. CDI entered these mischarged labor costs in increments of 0.5 hours or less to evade detection.